If the default case of 0 trades being made resulted in a profit factor of 0, this wouldnt occur. (Generally what happens is one side of the trades fall off, and the other side are optimized to the point where a very high win rate occurs (95%) for a handful of trades over a multi-year backtest, resulting in a very high profit factor).I have a large set of inputs for optimization and use the genetic optimizer over brute force, and have generally good results using Max net profit, but when I fine tune I like to move to multi-target optimization and the default case for 0 trades = 1.0 profit factor is something that I feel like is easily fixed, so I wanted to pose the question on whether this is truly intended behavior.
It may be true that in the event I am running into, a profit factor of 0 wouldn't prevent this case from popping up.
Comment